Even the CLIMATE CULT leaders are abandoning their own FAKE global warming narrative and funding AI and fossil fuels

Who’s still falling for the global warming scam? Anyone? Even the billionaires who fly around the world in the jets and cruise the seas in their yachts preaching about their global warming Ponzi scheme are shifting where they put their money, and that’s the tell-tale sign of all signs.

In her October 2, 2025, column for Bloomberg Opinion, Lara Williams argues that the political and corporate commitment to ambitious climate action is increasingly fragile, with world leaders and powerful industries retreating from their own pledges. Though climate rhetoric remains widespread, concrete policies are being delayed, watered down, or quietly abandoned. Williams suggests that this retreat signals a deeper collapse of the green movement in the face of mounting energy demands from technological change.

• World leaders like UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, US President Donald Trump, and EU officials are increasingly accused of backtracking on climate commitments, with delays on emissions targets and deforestation rules undermining pledges.
• Despite public reassurances from figures like Ursula von der Leyen, the EU remains divided on climate policy, reflecting a broader global failure: 74% of Paris Agreement signatories have not submitted updated 2025 targets, while governments plan to produce far more fossil fuels than climate goals allow.
• The explosive growth of artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and data centers is driving unprecedented energy demand, making tech companies like Microsoft backtrack on carbon-negative promises and prioritize energy access over green commitments.
• Analysts suggest the “green energy revolution” is faltering under the weight of soaring energy consumption, with tech firms, financial institutions, and media companies shifting focus from climate goals to securing vast, cheap power supplies—potentially aligning them with Trump-era policies.

Bloomberg: “Climate Deniers are Increasingly Hiding in Plain Sight”

One of the most striking developments is Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s reported decision to skip the COP30 United Nations climate summit in Brazil. Starmer, who once campaigned on climate leadership and previously attacked former prime minister Rishi Sunak for skipping COP27, risks appearing hypocritical and weak. His absence would echo a broader global trend: leaders such as U.S. President Donald Trump and members of the European Union are accused of failing to honor promises, creating a widening gap between climate rhetoric and reality.

Williams highlights that while EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen reaffirmed the bloc’s climate leadership at the UN, Europe’s recent actions tell another story. Member states remain locked in disputes over 2035 and 2040 emissions targets, and Brussels has delayed anti-deforestation measures by another year. Meanwhile, a law to improve forest fire monitoring was rejected by right-wing parties, while omnibus deregulation packages continue to weaken environmental protections. The Stockholm Environment Institute further underscores the problem: governments worldwide plan to produce 120% more fossil fuels by 2030 than consistent with a 1.5°C pathway, and nearly three-quarters of Paris Agreement signatories have not submitted updated climate targets.

The article suggests that Trump’s opposition to climate action has emboldened others, accelerating the unraveling of the movement. Yet, Williams notes that resistance to green policies extends beyond the English-speaking world, particularly in Asia, where economic and technological ambitions take precedence over emissions pledges. The rise of artificial intelligence and semiconductor manufacturing underscores this shift, with energy demands threatening to outpace any conceivable green transition.

The so-called “energy transition,” Williams contends, is colliding with reality. Foundational innovations like electric vehicles, reshored manufacturing, and especially AI are proving far more energy-intensive than anticipated. For instance, each high-end AI chip from Nvidia consumes as much electricity annually as three electric cars, and demand for such chips is effectively limitless. U.S. utilities now warn of unprecedented electricity demand driven by data centers, with some facilities consuming more power than steel mills.

Derailed corporate climate ambitions

This trend has already derailed corporate climate ambitions. Microsoft, once committed to being carbon-negative by 2030, reported that its emissions in 2023 were 30% higher than in 2020, largely due to AI expansion. Despite continued public commitments, the tech industry now recognizes that its competitiveness depends on abundant, cheap energy.

Williams concludes that the green energy revolution is faltering because the AI and technology boom demands more energy than renewables can deliver in the required timeframe. Companies and governments alike are quietly pivoting away from climate promises, preparing instead to secure massive energy supplies.

The irony, she observes, is that some of the same corporate actors who once championed environmentalism—and backed political candidates aligned with climate goals—may now quietly align with Trump in pursuit of energy security. In short, climate deniers are no longer on the fringe; they are, Williams suggests, “hiding in plain sight,” as the green transition gives way to a new era of energy realism.

Check out ClimateAlarmism.news for updates on psychotic billionaires pretending like the earth is going to boil next year so they can take all our money and control us.

Sources for this article include:

NaturalNews.com

BezoEarthFund.org

Wattsupwiththat.com