08/22/2023 / By Ethan Huff
By the year 2030, the following 14 cities in the United States are planning to completely outlaw all meat and dairy consumption, as well as all private vehicle ownership and use, in order to conform to the “green” climate standards of the so-called C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group:
• Austin, Texas
• Boston, Massachusetts
• Chicago, Illinois
• Houston, Texas
• Los Angeles, California
• Miami, Florida
• New Orleans, Louisiana
• New York City, New York
• Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
• Phoenix, Arizona
• Portland, Oregon
• San Francisco, California
• Washington, D.C.
• Seattle, Washington
All 14 of these cities are part of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, which has an “ambitious target” of achieving “0 kg [of] meat consumption,” “0 kg [of] dairy consumption,” only “3 new clothing items per person per year,” “0 private vehicles” owned, and only “1 short-haul return flight (less than 1500 km) every 3 years per person.”
This is all outlined in “The Future of Urban Consumption in a 1.5°C World” report, which was originally published in 2019 and “reemphasized” in 2023, the year of what appears to be a major financial collapse and possible transition into a new world order.
(Related: A lot of meat is becoming unsafe to consume anyway due to cattle being injected with mRNA “vaccines.”)
Democrat billionaire Michael Bloomberg, who ran for president with almost zero support, is the primary funder of the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group. In addition to the aforementioned 14 U.S. cities that are involved, at least 86 other cities around the world are also on the list for no more meat and dairy, very few clothing purchases allowed, no more private vehicle ownership, and almost no more flying on airplanes come 2030.
Bloomberg, of course, will continue to gorge on expensive meals filled with fancy meat, as well as unlimited private plane ownership and use. The peons underneath him, though, will be reduced to mere cattle in his envisioned new world order.
If the C40 Cities goals are new to you, it is probably because very few media outlets are reporting on it. In fact, there is an aggressive “fact checking” war being waged on all news about C40 Cities and what the plan entails that aims to “debunk” it is a “conspiracy theory.”
The AFP Fact Check service went after conservative commentator Glenn Beck for this very thing recently, claiming that his mention of the C40 Cities plan to ban meat, dairy, cars, and clothing consumption are “not policy recommendations.”
“This report does not advocate for the wholesale adoption of these more ambitious targets in C40 cities; rather, they are included to provide a set of reference points that cities, and other actors, can reflect on when considering different emission-reduction alternatives and long-term urban visions,” the AFP Fact Check claims.
The C40 Cities report’s use of the term “target,” though, implies that this is a “desired goal” of the initiative, which means that eventually it will be codified into policy and law and forced on the masses as the final solution to climate change.
“IF these were not their goals, they would not have labeled them ‘ambitious targets,'” writes Evita Duffy-Alfonso for The Federalist.
“Right now, hedge funds and private billionaires are buying up residential homes and farmland all over the world. At the same time, unrealistic zero-emissions policies are impoverishing Westerners and annihilating the middle class, which is fueling reliance on centralized government.”
If you live in one of the above cities and plan to be around in 2030, then perhaps you may wish to consider moving somewhere freer?
The “green” life is one marked by tyranny, poverty, forced veganism, and utter misery. Learn more at GreenTyranny.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
2030, absurd, Agenda 2030, Austin, C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, cars, chaos, Climate, climate change, collpase, dairy, economic collapse, freedom, global warming, great texan, green, green tyranny, insanity, left cult, Liberty, Libtards, meat, suppressed, Tyranny
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author