Leftists introduce “CLIMATE MURDER” charges to try to terminate the oil industry and force automobile manufacturers to go all electric

If shutting down oil pipelines, banning fracking and punishing automobile manufacturers for their “carbon footprint” wasn’t enough, the left-wing climate change activists are now looking to use their hysterical conjecture and authoritarian climate lawfare to end the oil industry as we know it and make Americans dependent on an electric vehicle grid.

“Climate murder” charges are coming

To accomplish this, left-wing climate activists (who believe the world is ending if we don’t stop carbon emissions) are introducing a new concept called “CLIMATE MURDER.” Under this authoritarian new rule, oil companies can be accused of second-degree murder when temperatures rise in the summer, leading to inevitable heat-related deaths.

If accepted as precedent, the same “climate murder” conjecture can apply to deaths that result from other natural weather phenomenon such as tornadoes, earthquakes, lightning, flash-flooding, wildfires and hurricanes.

It’s typical leftist logic. It’s no different than when Democrats blame law-abiding gun owners for the heinous acts of school shooters. It’s no different than blaming guns for acts committed by individuals with criminal intent. It’s no different than new gun laws that restrict the freedoms of people who did not commit the crime. Leftists have repeatedly said they want to prosecute the National Rifle Association for criminal acts that they do not commit.

Of course, the hysterical left never calls for justice when a pharmaceutical product is directly linked to a person’s death. Instead, the Democrats mandate that people take poison, and believe they will never be held accountable for forcing people to take shots that injure and kill people.

Human knowledge is under attack! Governments and powerful corporations are using censorship to wipe out humanity's knowledge base about nutrition, herbs, self-reliance, natural immunity, food production, preparedness and much more. We are preserving human knowledge using AI technology while building the infrastructure of human freedom. Use our decentralized, blockchain-based, uncensorable free speech platform at Brighteon.io. Explore our free, downloadable generative AI tools at Brighteon.AI. Support our efforts to build the infrastructure of human freedom by shopping at HealthRangerStore.com, featuring lab-tested, certified organic, non-GMO foods and nutritional solutions.

Prosecutors are looking to blame heat waves on oil companies and make them responsible for deaths

Former federal prosecutor Cindy Cho was one of the first to advocate for second-degree murder prosecutions against major fossil fuel companies. Her outlandish opinion comes in response to the deadly heat wave that ravaged Maricopa County, Arizona, in July 2023, claiming the lives of 403 residents.

The premise of Cho’s argument is chillingly straightforward: Big Oil, alongside other fossil fuel giants, knowingly contributed to the atmospheric carbon buildup that has intensified global temperatures, thereby directly contributing to extreme weather events like the Arizona heat wave. This, she contends, amounts to culpable recklessness akin to second-degree murder under the law.

If these prosecutors get their way, they will be able to breakup the entire energy infrastructure, sending oil executives to prison, levying fines that will make it all but impossible to continue drilling and providing affordable gas and diesel. Of course, this will absolutely collapse our economy and destroy American civilization, leaving tens of millions of families unable to afford food and transportation.

Public Citizen released a memo detailing the legal foundations for such prosecutions. The memo claims that prosecuting fossil fuel companies for climate-related deaths is not only morally justified but also legally feasible. They urge local prosecutors to initiate criminal investigations into these corporations’ roles in climate-related fatalities.

Bill McKibben, a prominent climate activist, added fuel to the fire, stating, “What’s happened to the climate is a crime.” McKibben argues that fossil fuel companies, despite clear warnings from the scientific community, continued to exacerbate climate change unabatedly, resulting in a mounting death toll and shattered futures. In the medical community, there are talks of adding “climate change” to death certificates. One study blames a certain level of human breathing for generating enough carbon emissions to kill someone.

However, not everyone shares these outlandish, hysterical perspectives on weather, temperature and death. Marc Morano of Climate Depot dismissed these calls for prosecution as sensationalism, labeling them part of a broader agenda to merge public health concerns with climate change narratives. Morano contends that attributing “climate homicide” to fossil fuel companies overlooks the broader context of human adaptation to climate variability, citing statistics purportedly showing a decline in climate-related deaths since 1920, thanks in part to technological advancements fueled by fossil fuels.

Sources include:

ClimateDepot.com

PublicCitizen.org

TheLancet.com

ClimateDepot.com

ClimateDepot.com